Modelling the ‘library domain’: a consultative workshop on June 19
The challenge of making library resources visible and accessible in the Web 2.0 environment was a major focus of last year’s JISC/SCONUL study of Library Management Systems.
The JISC TILE (Towards Implementation of Library 2.0 and the e-Framework) project was subsequently commissioned to draft a high level ‘library domain model’ which could be used to further thinking about the functions and processes that library systems need to support in future.
We are now organising a workshop to consult on the domain model proposed, and how it might be used in the future.
Who should attend?
The workshop is intended for a mix of senior and middle library managers in a range of roles (so, not confined to colleagues with formal IT/systems management responsibilities).
Where and when is it?
Friday 19th June 2009 at the Institution of Engineering and Technology, Savoy Place, central London.
What is the programme for the day?
The programme consists of a mixture of presentations and group work.
How do I register?
Due to the consultative nature of this workshop, we have a limited number of places. If you would like to attend, please register your interest by 18th May 2009, and we will contact you thereafter to confirm your place or add your name to a waiting list.
Library round up: event, discussion and new domain model
This post more or less repeats some JISC news items (sorry) but I wanted to make sure readers of this blog saw some JISC library related activity that has been discussed, published and presented this week. In particular I want to draw attention to Peter Murray-Rust’s blog posts on the Library of the Future, in case anyone wants to contribute before he speaks at the JISC/Bodleian Library event on 2 April. You can register to attend the Libraries of the Future event in person or in Second Life. Related information:
Overview. Speakers. Registration. Agenda.
Event tag: LOTF09
Peter has blogged some ideas and sought feedback (you’ll need to scroll through a few pages on his blog to see all of the discussion). He has identified some people and organizations that, as a scientist he personally considers relevant to librarians / libraries of the future. He only includes a couple of librarians; the list of those identified leans towards computer scientists not information scientists. In general (my crude summary of a wide ranging discussion!) he appears to be highlighting the need for a revolutionary attitude, more experimentation and for academic librarians to be promoters of good policy and practice with regards to ownership and access to scholarship, and the need to move to the web.
“…the librarians of the future. They build vital, communal, information resources. They invite collaboration, either directly or implicitly. They overthrow conventional wisdom and entrenched systems and interests.”
The blog discussion is interesting, there have been quite a few contributions, and I think it points to the importance of communication between librarians, computers scientists, researchers, learners and university managers.
And to briefly draw your attention to some other library focused activity from JISC this week:
The TILE (Towards the Implementation of Library 2.0 and the eFramework) project report and briefing paper has been published. This includes a library domain model developed to identify what the library processes are in the networked environment in the light of changing behaviour and information provision. The work has focused in particular on two increasingly important areas in delivering relevant services, these are context/personalization and contribution. There will be further consultation on the domain model via a workshop later in the year.
Finally at the JISC Conference this week there was a session on the Future of Academic Library – this discussed issues such as shared services, the evolving library collection and introduced a collaboration between JISC, SCONUL, BL, RLUK and RIN to consult and develop positions on the way in which libraries can respond to change.
Prepare to get happy
The JISC Developer Happiness Days event is approaching fast.
If you are:
- A developer for software used in higher education
- Someone who uses higher education software and is interested in its development
- Looking to develop your coding skills
- Interested in community collaboration
- Want to make new contacts
Then the Developer Happiness Days event is for you.
We’re bringing together the cream of the crop of educational software developers along with coders from other sectors, users, and technological tinkerers in an exciting new forum.
Share your skills and knowledge with the coding community in a stimulating and fun environment and come away with new skills, fresh contacts – and you might even win a prize.
The top ideas generated at the event will be documented, publicised and made available to the community.
Full details of the event can be found at: http://www.dev8d.org
Further announcements about accommodation and details of the event competitions will be announced via the event blog: http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org/
The tag for the event is dev8D.
Information Environment (IE) & Virtual Research Environments (VRE) call for proposals: Briefing Day notes/Q & A
On 15th December a briefing day on the Information Environment and e-Research JISC Circular (12/08) was held. The event was held in order to provide an overview of the circular and to give people the opportunity to ask questions. The circular has £11m of JISC funding against it which is quite substantial. The calls in 12/08 focus on: digital repositories for learning and research, virtual research environments, use of text-mining and automatic meta-data generation and digital preservation. So in short the circular is seeking projects that are mainly about the creation, management and sharing of information that is part of the research and learning process in ways that support researchers, learners, teachers and administrators.
Here are the links to the presentations from the Briefing Day:
Policy and bid submission
Automated Metadata and Text-mining- strand A1
Digital Repositories: Start-up, rapid innovation and enhancement - strands A3- A5
Developing e-infrastructure to support research disciplines and digital preservation exemplars - strands A2 and A6
Virtual Research Environments (VRE) - strands B1-B3
Notes of the discussion and questions and answers from the briefing day:
IE and VRE Circular 12/08 15 December Briefing Day questions and answers
For some notes of the whole event as it went along see Andy Powell’s (Eduserv Foundation) live blog.
A few points of context:
JISC has funded projects and services in all of these areas previously. So what is different this time? I would say there are three general issues that underpin the projects sought in this circular:
* reflecting the maturity of digital repositories and other types of ‘e-infrastructure’ this circular is seeking further and improved alignment of these systems with user requirements. An emphasis in the calls is the need to involve/take into account end-users and a bringing together of these ‘e-infrastructure’ systems with research and learning processes.
* both the IE and the VRE strands of activity are about building on previous investment and lessons - so these are not completely new areas of activity. In the case of repository and digital preservation activity for example we’re seeking more repositories, improved repositories and policies, further integration with other systems and in areas such as digital preservation we’re looking for actual implementation of solutions that have previously been developed. However although this circular is generally about implementing areas where there has already been substantial work the projects are about improvement and so will involve new ideas and development.
* recognition that in many cases cross domain teams and skills are required to create, manage, use and develop digital systems, supporting policies and related practices within institutions.
The decision to publish the IE and VRE call strands together was partly a practical one as both funding areas were due to issue circulars at the same time, but there was more to this decision than that. Publishing them together was, I think, essential in terms of showing that information systems should not be developed independently of the requirements of the research process. I think if we’d published the calls separately there would’ve been a danger of perpetuating this often unhelpful division. In particular the projects sought under A2, Developing e-infrastructure to support research disciplines bridge both areas and seek to bring the research process and scholarly communications requirements together with underlying information systems. This particular strand in the IE calls also represents the fact that developing the Information Environment (or e-infrastructure) is not just about managing and disseminating information it is about supporting and improving research (and of course learning and teaching, although the projects called for under A2 focus on research). I think the connections that are emerging between both the IE and VRE programme areas are a good thing and are inevitable to progress.
Roll up, roll up for the Developer Happiness Days
JISC are sponsoring an event aimed at software developers in HE on February 9th-13th 2009.
The event will consist of training activities, a development competition, community focused events and a whole lot of networking opportunities.
The event will take place in London. Entry will be free and is designed for developers working in all areas of HE. Developers from outside the UK and from the commercial sector are also very welcome to attend. If you aren’t a software developer but are still interested then you may want to come along to learn, network, observe and maybe provide a user perspective for the developers participating in the event.
There is an event blog which has a registration form and some further details http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org/.
Please sign up if you are interested. There are places for about 200 people.
The blog will be updated with more details of the event in due course.
The event tag is dev8D, please use it when discussing the event.
If you have any questions about the event, please leave a comment on the event blog or email d dot flanders at bbk dot ac dot uk or a dot mcgregor at jisc dot ac dot uk.
Mashing thingISBN and library lookup using yahoo pipes courtesy of Mashed libraries 2008
I attended the Mashed libraries event organised by Owen Stephens and UKOLN on Thursday 27th. See Owen’s blog for an overview of the day. I am not a techie but I do love to mess around with software so I was expecting to be an interested observer rather than do any mashing myself. However the event was so good that even a tinkerer like me was able to put something useful together as a result.
Tony Hirst demonstrated how to use Yahoo Pipes to do a number of useful things. One of the things Tony showed was how to use LibraryThing’s ThingISBN api to look up alternative editions of a book using the ISBN. Tony goes into detail about this pipe on his blog.
I am a regular user of my local public library but the opac search experience is truly horrible; clunky, slow and restrictive. The fastest and most reliable way to search is by ISBN. However the problem with ISBN searching is that the opac covers 9 boroughs so there are bound to be alternative versions of most books and the opac is not clever enough to be able to detect this so I have to augment ISBN searches with painful title or author searches. ThereforeTony’s pipe offered a possible solution to my problem.
Tony’s pipe was designed to link the results for all the alternative ISBNs to Amazon so it was simple to tweak it to display links to my local library instead. My version of Tony’s pipe can be seen on my yahoo pipes page.
However it would be a bit of a pain to have to go to yahoo pipes every time I wanted to look up alternative ISBNs for a book so I tried to think of ways to make it more convenient. My first instinct was to try and make a netvibes widget that I could use to search for alternative ISBNs. However making a widget that accepted variable input in the ISBN field proved beyond me. Just as I was about to give up I thought of a different way.
I already use Jon Udell’s library lookup bookmarklet to scrape ISBNs from Amazon pages and search for them in my local library catalogue. Perhaps it was possible to use this with the pipe?
It was not only possible but incredibly simple. You can select the pipe to output alternative ISBNs in an RSS feed. When you do this, you get the following url: http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=6c6dc73754946fa278bbc1f76cddc469&_render=rss&isbn=0099469693
All I had to do was plug this url (minus the isbn number at the end) into the library lookup bookmarklet generator, choose Innovative from the vendor list, click the build button and drag the result to your browser toolbar. Now I have a bookmarklet that can scrape an ISBN from an Amazon record and look up all alternative versions of the book on my local library opac.
It is not perfect, it is ugly and it does not distinguish between ISBNs for books that the library holds and those that it does not. However, it is something that I will use on an almost daily basis and I am unreasonably pleased with myself. Thanks Tony, Owen and Mashed Libraries.
I find events like Mashed libraries incredibly useful and I always come away buzzing with ideas. JISC will be putting on an event for developers early next year. Look out for more news on this on the event blog at http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org
***Update***Thanks to Owen’s prompting on Twitter, I have now modified the pipe so that it only displays links to editions of the book that the library holds. This uses the content of the h1 tags on the opac pages to judge whether a book is held or a null result is returned and then filters out the null results. It is a rather inelegant solution and is very specific to the opac of my local public library but I imagine could be generalised if you were willing to mess about with it.
“… to engage or not engage…” the choice for libraries.
A couple of weeks ago I attended the RLUK conference, their first conference and one that everyone there seemed to enjoy. Unfortunately I only made it for the last day for a slot where a panel of funders, policy bodies and service providers, including JISC, said a few words about priorities and partnership with others.
I did get to hear Lynne Brindley speak. She covered a lot of ground and most of what she said chimed with JISC priorities; albeit coming from a different set of organisational boundaries. Anyway I thought I’d just jot down what Lynne said as I think the issues she raised are well worth recounting here. I might’ve misinterpreted some things, especially since it was a while ago now but on the whole I think I’ve captured the main points.
In general she was referring to the fact that in the complex digital environment offering services that remain relevant and take advantage of what Lynne called “mass creativity” can be difficult. But she said the choice for libraries is “ to engage or not engage”. Unsurprisingly the message was to engage.
A summary of issues she raised:
• Developing digital information services does incur a cost. A lot of innovative projects have been developed but we have not yet fully tackled sustainability.
• Libraries should support innovative scholarship. We’re now in a complex world where the web is a platform of “mass creativity” but offers real opportunities for innovative scholarship. She referred to some examples where digitisation and making digital resources available have led to new knowledge.
• Libraries need to move well beyond the critical role they play in licensing and recognise that things like document supply are not as relevant as they once were.
• “life beyond the document” how should libraries respond to this?
• The research data question and the skills gap – we have data librarians but not enough of them; traditionally libraries are more orientated towards humanities.
• Masses of information of different types – blogs, email etc are all important to scholarship they are the ephemeral information of today; what are we doing about versions of works or notes and annotations? Think of authorship and how notes are kept of authors that enhance research.
• Many people use information in different ways, skim reading etc, therefore should delivery be different, does it matter that people use information differently? Information literacy does that matter? Should libraries be helping to equip people with the skills to make the right judgments?
• The researchers of the future (and quite a few researching now) come from the born digital age and will use information differently, so what is information literacy?
• Web archiving: the web is a huge resource that must be accessible into the future for research; the legal issues are a problem but hopefully legal deposit will make a difference.
• The value of the library can sometimes be summarised as: authenticity, authority and long-term use – what about authority v amateur?
• Digital preservation is very important – this has been seen as important at policy and government levels but now it is getting into the public conscience - this is when libraries start to have real success with these issues. Just tell someone that all those photos will not be accessible and they can relate to it.
• She ended on intellectual property (IP) and referred to the EU Green Paper on Copyright and how IP deserved attention and organisations, such as academic libraries, needed to take action so any risk of locking information down further was mitigated. She emphasised that without reasonable copyright exceptions there is a risk to democratic society.
A lot of these issues are being addressed by libraries and organisations like the British Library and JISC, for example we’re responding to the EU Green Paper on Copyright in the Knowledge Economy. But despite that all of the issues require further debate and change.
JISC is about to launch a collaborative initiative with SCONUL, RLUK, The British Library and RIN that builds on our Libraries of the Future campaign and that will seek to further understand and shape the position of libraries into the future. Watch this space…it should be announced shortly.
Grant Funding Opportunities
An update on funding opportunities …
This month, November 2008, we will be releasing a Call for projects for grant funding. Outline details are on the Grant Funding Roadmap. UK FE/HE institutions are eligible to bid, with some types of projects restricted to HEFCE- and HEFCW- funded institutions, due to funding streams.
We’re finalising the Call at the moment, but you won’t go far wrong if you start thinking about what you want to do in:
- implementing automated metadata and textmining
- starting up repositories for research data, research papers, learning materials
- networking and enhancing repositories
- preservation in relation to repositories
- short technical projects to improve repository services
- connections between services to support particular disciplines
Bidders will have until January to prepare proposals, and succesful projects will be expected to start by 1st April 2009.
For those of you most interested in supporting research, please note there will also be a Call for projects related to Virtual Research Environments.
If learning and teaching resources are of particular interest, in December there will also be a Call for the forthcoming HEA/JISC Open Educational Content programme.
Date for your diary: Monday 15th December will be a Briefing Day for anyone who would like to come and hear about the funding opportunities related to the Information Environment and Virtual Research Environment Calls. It will be in Central London, probably 10-4. Details will be released soon.
If you’re not based in UK FE/HE, you may be interested in the Funding Roadmap for Invitations to Tender. These are open to anyone, so if you think you have expertise relevant to the sort of issues reported on this blog, then tenders are very welcome.
We will announce the Call on this blog as soon as it is released.
The JISC Preservation of Web Resources Workshop (PoWR)
The first JISC-PoWR workshop took place on Friday (27th June 2008) at Senate House Library, University of London and was attended by over 30 people from a wide range of professional groupings, including the Web management and Records Management communities. The workshop was entitled ‘Preservation of Web Resources: Making a Start’ and considered how delegates could begin to consider including Web resources in their preservation strategy. There was much interest in the case study presented by the University of Bath which illustrated the differing perspectives held by the web and records management communities. Bringing together these communities is something the project is seeking to address.The main presentations are now available for download:
http://jiscpowr.jiscinvolve.org/2008/06/30/workshop-1-resources-available/
Posted by: Neil Grindley
Using Repositories for Learning and Teaching: Can we find a recipe for success?
I attended a JISC Repositories and Preservation Programme meeting, but for a change I was able to sit back and learn rather than run around stressed as the entire event was designed and organised by DRaW, one of the projects in the start up and enhancement strand of the programme.
This was the first of 6 programme meetings that will be delivered by the projects rather than programme managers and, in my opinion, it was a roaring success.
You can read summaries of the day produced by Nick Sheppard of the Leeds Met Repository project and Julian Beckton of the Lirolem project. The day started with 6 quickfire introductions to the Lirolem, Circle, DRaW, YSJ Digirep and Faroes projects and an overview of the issues with learning and teaching repositories from Andrew Rothery (of the University of Worcester) and Phil Barker (of JISC CETIS). We also had two impromtu introductions to the POCKET and Edspace projects. It ws interesting to note that all of these projects were adopting a different approach to the implementation of a repository:
- Julian Beckton presented the Lirolem project. They have developed an collaborative working space for architects that has a deposit facility straight into the repository and the repository itself has an interesting interface for displaying compound objects.
- Steve Burholt presented the Circle project. It has made the repository itself largely invisible and have focused on building interfaces for specific purposes such as basic search and a really nice search and reuse interface to the repository from inside their VLE.
- Sarah Hayes talked about the DRaW project. They are focusing on consulting with staff to produce a service that they would find useful as they have had a learning and teaching repository for 3 years but have not experienced significant usage. This compares badly to the research repository that has been in place for less than a year and is getting much heavier usage.
- Helen Westmancoat from the YSJ Digirep project has focused on a number of specific collections in their institution, this has had the benefit of promoting widespread interest amongst the other parts of the instiution.
- Dave Millard spoke about the Faroes project. They have adopted a very lightweight approach, focused on hosting an academics learning assets and providing web 2.0 features on the platform. They have chosen a minimal approach to metadata and shifted the focus of the repository from metadata to the object.
- Sarah Malone got up to talk about POCKET and how it is turning existing learning materials into Open Content using the Open University’s OpenLearn platform.
- Debra Morris introduced Edspace, which is a large institutional exemplar project that is aiming to develop a sustainable solution that is firmly embedded in institutional culture and infrastructure.
The afternoon session focused on using the experiences of the delegates to try and prepare a list of recommendations for people implementing a learning and teaching repository. The outcomes of this discussion will be turned into a document that can be shared. This will complement the structured guidelines for starting a learning and teaching repository produced by the CD-LOR project.
The slides from the event, the audio recordings and the recommendations will all be available from the DRaW website in due course.
I learned an awful lot at the event and it was really gratifying that the tone of discussions became more optimistic as the day wore on. From my conversations with delegates the day was really useful to them and I am looking forward to the remaining events in this series (see more details in this earlier post). I think that this type of event will complement the more traditional JISC programme meeting in a way that is beneficial to JISC programme objectives and to the projects.